To My Facebook ‘Friends’ That Think They Know More Than They Actually Know

I don’t use Facebook all that much nor do I post a lot of content.

When I joined some 14 or 15 years ago I felt it would be a convenient way to stay in touch with family happenings near and far along with those of a few old high school friends and some of the people I worked with and had a personal connection of some sort over the years.

My expectations were met as I was able to see how things were going with people that meant something to me, as I wouldn’t have friended them in the first place if they didn’t.

Unfortunately, I find increasingly now that if someone shares something on FB that strays too far from the beliefs of some individuals, they feel it is their sacred duty to set the other person straight in their thinking, for the common good I imagine.

I have a high school friend that I couldn’t be farther apart from when it comes to politics. I don’t berate his FB comments or jokes I don’t agree with, because in America we have the right to make form individual opinions, or at least we used to before our right to state a contrary opinion came under fire.

What most people don’t consider is that since I am retired, I have an awful lot of time to read and consider things before I form an actual opinion.

I learned to be thorough and not make pre-assumptions early on when I had my consulting firm and later when I worked for an international high-tech company in Silicon Valley with the responsibility of creating documents that were used to make decisions that would impact future corporate direction where many millions of dollars were involved.

Gather the information, analyze it, form an opinion, document your case and then present your case worked well for me over the years. So with that in mind, why would I go to this much trouble for a few individuals that “Think They Know More Than They Actually Know.” I guess it kind of pissed me off when they gave crap to one of my daughters that recently recovered from COVID.

Yesterday, I posted the item below with the comment, “Something To Think About.”

We are all aware that there is a big push for people to get vaccinated, whether they have recovered from COVID and gained natural immunity, or not. Actually, recent studies show that recovered individuals have more robust immunity against COVID variants because the vaccines target the virus in its pre-variant stage so are less effective as variations of the original COVID circulate.

  • FB Commentor #1 – The problem with natural immunity is the prospect of spending a few months on supplemental oxygen on your way there.
  • FB Commentor #2 – or that several hundred thousand of your countrymen have to die while you get yours.
  • FB Commentor #3 – Fortunately, most people are recovering with no lingering issues
  • FB Commentor #2 – Thankfully, there is still a 98.4% survival rate (Actually a stat for Australia)
  • FB Commentor #2 – The 70,000 Californians who’ve died from it, will be glad to hear that.
  • FB Commentor #3 – Over 200,000 Californians die every year from heart disease, cancer, stroke, Alzheimer’s, respiratory disease, accidents, diabetes, influenza/pneumonia, hypertension, and chronic liver disease. Many of these are the underlying issues that are contributing to Covid deaths. Maybe if we focus on preventing these underlying issues by helping people live healthier lifestyles, we will not only help lower Covid deaths, but also the deaths from these health issues themselves.
  • FB Commentor #1 – Most people who get it get over it, but you might have to call out the National Guard to keep your local hospital staffed in the meantime. Covid ain’t the black plague, but it has increased the overall death rate in the United States by about 15 percent in the past two years. It’s serious stuff, if unpredictable in its severity from person to person.
  • FB Commentor #4 – Guess the liberal sheep don’t like your post….keep it up, buddy.
  • FB Commentor #5 – Via Messenger, Great point 👍
  • End of comments.
Big-Pharma, with the help of the World Health Organisation, the CDC, mainstream media, and elite power brokers in the medical community demonized the use of Hydroxychloroquine, Ivermectin, and others that are saving lives in other parts of the world. Additionally, they discount the value of natural immunity gained after recovering from COVID.
So for those that “Think They Know More Than They Actually Know” Here are some articles you should find informative from just this month of October.

COVIDLAND: Episode 1 – The Lockdown

Episode 1: The Lockdown

On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared a pandemic under the pretense of a deadly novel coronavirus that they falsely claimed had a death rate of 3.4%, which has been shown to be closer to .26% of those infected and more often for older people in the population with co-morbidities. Another consideration is the proven overcounting of COVID deaths by attributing deaths resulting from other health issues or tragedies to Covid. So it is probable that we will never know how many people truly died just because they got COVID.

More than 190 member countries of the WHO imposed lockdowns, putting most of the global population under strict martial law. Unscientific lockdowns proved to be a lucrative business model for the global elite, expanding their wealth by $5 trillion dollars and adding one new billionaire every 17 hours throughout the year.

Meanwhile, the World Bank says that as many as 124 million people went into “extreme poverty,” the first time to increase in decades.

Were these lockdowns justified? The official data for 2020 does not show a statistically relevant increase in aggregate deaths.

Instead, the global population increased by 1.05%!

This first episode of the Covidland series, The Lockdown, exposes the fraud behind the COVID numbers and explores the economic repercussions and human cost of lockdowns that will echo for generations.

Via Infowars.

Emergency Doctor Exposes Authorities Are Standing In The Way of Ivermectin Use

A British Columbia emergency doctor working in an Alberta hospital says he was relieved of duty for administering Ivermectin.

Dr. Daniel Nagase graduated from Dalhousie University in 2004 and went on to work as an emergency doctor for 10 years. In 2015, Nagase went on to practice in rural, under-served communities in Alberta.

Nagase spoke at the Vancouver Art Gallery last Friday for the 75 Anniversary of the Nuremberg Code and shared his experience in the Rimbey, Alta. hospital while he was caring for three COVID19 patients in September.

“All the patients were on oxygen and extremely short of breath. The only medication these patients were on was steroids, a medication that will decrease inflammation, but increase the chances of bacterial infection by suppressing the immune system,” said Nagase.

Speaking with the patients, Nagase suggested they try Ivermectin, an anti-parasite drug that’s been blacklisted for the treatment of COVID-19, yet has shown promise in recent ongoing studies.

“All three patients wanted to try Ivermectin,” said Nagase.

Nagase wasn’t able to find any at the hospital and said the Red Deer Hospital’s Central Pharmacy “refused to send Ivermectin” telling him it was “useless for COVID.”

He was then contacted by Dr. Gerald Lazarenko, the provincial medical director for pharmacy services for Alberta Health Services (AHS) who “insisted that Ivermectin had no place in the treatment of COVID.”

In the meantime, Nagase says he reached out to the local pharmacy for Ivermectin and started his three patients on Hydroxychloroquine, an antimalarial drug approved to treat autoimmune conditions.

“I also started Vitamin C, Vitamin D, and Zinc,” said Nagase, who added he gave them Salbutamol and Flovent inhalers along with the antibiotic Azithromycin.

Nagase said by late that afternoon the town pharmacist was able to acquire Ivermectin from an agriculture supply. The pharmacist double-checked and confirmed the product was the exact same as that used for humans and Nagase then provided the appropriate dose to his patients according to their weight.

Within hours of obtaining the Ivermectin, Nagase says he got a call from Dr. Jennifer Bestard, the central zone medical director, informing him he was “forbidden from giving Ivermectin to patients.”

“She said it was a violation of AHS policy to give Ivermectin for COVID.

“But that wasn’t good enough. The next day she called the hospital and gave me 15 minutes notice that I would be relieved of my duties.”

Nagase confirmed an hour later a local doctor arrived to replace him.

“They didn’t even want me to check up on the patients that I gave Ivermectin to,” he said.

“Not even 24 hours after getting Ivermectin, two out of my three patients were almost completely better. They were out of bed walking around and all the crackles I heard in their lungs from the day before were gone. All it took was about 18 hours and one dose of Ivermectin.”

Nagase said his third patient, a 95-year-old, stayed the same but “didn’t get any worse like she had done the night previous.”

“I found out later that no sooner had I left Rimbey hospital, the next doctor who came to replace me stopped the antibiotics, stopped all the vitamins, she even stopped the patient’s inhalers, to help her breathe.”

Nagase has since learned that two of the patients he treated had both left the hospital that week.

“No doctor would take away antibiotics and inhalers for any viral pneumonia, never mind COVID. No doctor would do that to any patient with pneumonia. Unless they were … Well I’ll let you think about that,” said Nagase in his speech.

Nagase says he has been banned from hospital practice throughout Alberta by AHS Chief Medical Officer Dr. Fraincois Belanger. He also says after he filed a complaint against Dr. Lazarenko for withholding a life-saving medication from patients, “the Alberta College of Physicians and Surgeons forbade doctors and pharmacists from giving patients Ivermectin.”

“There is something malicious going on. I hope you can all see the bigger picture.”

The Western Standard reached out to AHS for comment on Dr. Nagase’s allegations and was told to refer to a statement shared on their Twitter account.

The tweet says AHS is aware of the speech made by Dr. Nagase and says they do not approve of the use of Ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19.

“All physicians – including temporary locums – are governed by AHS’ medical bylaws when working in an AHS facility. Under these bylaws, there are expectations for all physicians to follow regarding unapproved use of medical therapy,” said AHS.

“Requirements from provincial regulatory bodies for medical staff must be adhered to. Registrants of these governing bodies must not provide care that does not meet the expected standards of their profession.”