Taking On Woke Incorporated

Congratulations, graduates! Your days of leftist indoctrination are behind you.

Just kidding! The glass tower of the corporate world is fast becoming as woke as the ivory tower of the college world.

In Prager U’s 2021 commencement address below, Ben Shapiro offers some sage advice for how to stick to your values… no matter where you go.

Transcript:

Congratulations, graduates!

Your days of indoctrination in wokeism are behind you. Your worries about being graded down because you wouldn’t say America is systemically racist? Over. Your fears that you’d be socially shunned because of your failure to decry the evils of capitalism? Done. Yes, you’ve been liberated!

Next stop: the real world, where merit is rewarded, diversity of opinion is welcomed, and the free and open exchange of ideas is celebrated.

Just kidding.

The truth is, many of you are about to move from the ivory tower of the authoritarian left to…well, probably, the glass and steel tower of the authoritarian left.

Today’s business behemoths have also become bastions of woke thought. Terrified of discrimination lawsuits and all the time, money, and bad PR, they bend to every woke diktat that blows through their HR departments.

Corporations spend millions on useless “diversity compliance officers” whose sole purpose is to insulate them from an ever-expanding list of discrimination claims, but most especially, racism. That’s why, within the first few days on the job, you will likely be subjected to an orientation taught by a devotee of Ibram X. Kendi or Robin DiAngelo. During a day-long struggle session, this “anti-racist” consultant will inform you that, if you’re white, you must become “less white.” And if you’re a person of color (a P.O.C), you are a victim.

Corporations cater to their squeakiest customers—and the authoritarian left is nothing if not squeaky; it threatens boycotts and company-destroying publicity if businesses refuse to comply with its demands.

According to a study by James Bailey and Hilary Phillips as reported in the Harvard Business Review, a generic corporation identified as apolitical or liberal saw no blowback from a panel of prospective consumers; but a generic corporation identified as conservative saw a 33% drop in opinion, “entirely driven by participants who identified as Democrats.” That’s why your boss will likely send out regular company-wide emails assuring you that he or she or xe is on the Right Side of History and pledging millions of dollars in support of whatever the leftist cause du jour happens to be. And you’ll be forced to echo these messages or seek employment elsewhere.

Corporations, above all, are risk-averse and controversy averse. This means that they are petrified of their own woke workers and cater to them in order to avoid media-manufactured blowback. While apolitical staffers and conservatives may constitute the majority of employees at any company, the corporate heads are driven by fear of a vocal ideological minority. Which is why if you offend one of your fellow employees on a message board by suggesting that there are non-sexist reasons why men outnumber women in STEM jobs, you’ll be summarily fired. Just ask James Damore of Google.

Conservatives used to believe that what happened in college stayed in college. This was a colossal mistake. Slowly but surely, college radicals have renormalized America’s institutions. Let’s talk about how.

Author Nassim Nicholas Taleb discusses the process of re-normalization in his book, Skin in the Game. Let’s say you have a family of four, including one daughter who only eats vegan. Mom now has a choice: she can cook two meals—one for the non-vegan family members, and one for her daughter; or she can cook one meal with only vegan ingredients. She decides to cook only one meal. This is the renormalization of the family unit, which has converted from a majority non-vegan to vegan.

Now, says Taleb, have the family attend a barbecue with three other families. The host has to make the same choice mom did—make one meal or make two. This process of renormalization—the “new normal”—continues until broader and broader numbers have been moved by one inflexible person.

The same holds true in corporations. All it takes, according to physicist Serge Galam, is a tipping point: a certain percentage of the population joining an inflexible movement and demanding change from a less-than-motivated majority. Galam puts that number at approximately 20%.

So here’s the good news: Renormalization can work in reverse, too. Here’s how: Find a group of like-minded employees. Make demands that a majority of employees agree with. Be inflexible and be loud. Band together to resist the intrusions of the radical left.

Donald McNeil of The New York Times lost his job because he used the n-word in describing why not to use the n-word; 150 woke staffers at the Times complained to the editors and got him canned. But there are 1,200 employees at the Times. What if even 200 of those employees had pushed back?

You can lead the pushback. In fact, you should.

Now, that may seem like a lot to ask. Why should a CEO listen to his youngest employees? Fair question. But here’s the answer: they already do. It’s 23-year-old woke staffers who are forcing these corporations to the left. It’s going to take 23-year-old non-left staffers to move them back.

That means being smart. It means not making dumb mistakes on social media. It means building alliances with those who aren’t motivated primarily by politics. But just as you were in college, you are now in opposing territory. And that requires fighting back in strategic ways.

Be an advocate for truth and a warrior for liberty. Welcome to the real world—and the real fight.

I’m Ben Shapiro for Prager University.

Facts & Sources:

Today’s business behemoths have become bastions of woke thought, spending millions on “diversity” initiatives that often increase bias.

Terrified of discrimination lawsuits, an increasing number of corporations are bending to left-wing identity politics and social justice demands, spending massive amounts of money on “diversity and inclusion” initiatives. Many corporations now employ “diversity compliance officers” whose primary purpose is to insulate them from discrimination claims, especially involving alleged racism.

View source

Between 2014 and 2017, Google spent at least $265 million on initiatives to recruit a more diverse workforce. The effort resulted in “little headway” in that area. “Despite Google and its parent company’s public statements in support of diversity in technology and multiple outreach and community programs, it seems to have made little headway since it began publishing its workforce demographic data three years ago,” Axios reported in 2017.

View source

Studies have found that diversity trainings are generally a waste of resources and often increases bias in a workplace. “Three decades of studies examining hundreds of U.S. companies and interviews with employers and executives suggest that diversity training programs actually increase bias.,” Psychology Today explained in 2018. “Diversity training programs are designed to prevent lawsuits by policing people’s behaviors. Yet studies suggest that mandatory diversity programs can trigger bias rather than eliminate it. Laboratory studies show that people become resentful when they are forced to adopt behaviors. Most people resist being told how to think and behave and, therefore, will assert their autonomy.”

View source

Many corporations promote left-wing “anti-racism” ideology, forcing employees to look at the world and each other through a divisive racial lens.

Many corporate diversity training programs incorporate ideas and methods from the radical left “anti-racism” ideology, as most prominently espoused by Ibram X. Kendi and Robin DiAngelo.

View source

These “anti-racist” trainings frame society as a whole and most personal interactions in racial terms, teaching white employees that they inherently benefit from “white privilege” and minorities that they are victimized by this privilege. “Anti-racism” teaches that there is either racist or anti-racist, no middle ground and that one must be committed to the ideology “in all aspects” of one’s life. “In a society that privileges white people and whiteness, racist ideas are considered normal throughout our media, culture, social systems, and institutions,” claims the National Museum of African American History & Culture. “To create an equal society, we must commit to making unbiased choices and being antiracist in all aspects of our lives. Being an antiracist is fighting against racism. Racism takes several forms and works most often in tandem with at least one other form to reinforce racist ideas, behavior, and policy.”

View source

One corporate diversity training seminar that received national attention instructed white employees to “try to be less white.”

View source

Corporations are risk and controversy averse. This means they are petrified of their own woke workers and cater to them.

Many corporations believe it is riskier to be considered conservative as opposed to liberal, tending to go out of their way to promote progressive messages to avoid potential blowback from vocal left-wing activists. According to a 2020 study reported by Harvard Business Review, a generic corporation identified as apolitical or liberal saw no blowback from a panel of prospective consumers; but a generic corporation identified as conservative saw a 33 percent drop in opinion, “entirely driven by participants who identified as Democrats.”

View source

While apolitical staffers and conservatives may constitute the majority of employees at any company, the corporate heads are driven by fear of a vocal ideological minority. James Damore was famously fired by Google for offending a few fellow employees for suggesting on a message board that there are non-sexist reasons why men outnumber women in STEM jobs.

View source

Related reading: “The Authoritarian Left is on the March” – Ben Shapiro

View source

A vocal group of radical activists have renormalized America’s institutions and are now taking over its corporations.

Author Nassim Nicholas Taleb discusses the process of re-normalization in his book “Skin in the Game.” Let’s say you have a family of four, including one daughter who only eats vegan. Mom now has a choice: she can cook two meals, one for the non-vegan family members and one for her daughter; or she can cook one meal with only vegan ingredients. She decides to cook only one meal. Now, says Taleb, have the family attend a barbecue with three other families. The host has to make the same choice mom did – make one meal or two. This process of renormalization continues until broader and broader numbers have been moved by one inflexible person.

View source

The same process plays out in corporations. All it takes, according to physicist Serge Galam, is a tipping point: a certain percentage of the population joining an inflexible movement, and demanding change from a less-than-motivated majority. Galam puts that number at approximately 20 percent.

View source

Donald McNeil of The New York Times lost his job because he used the N-word in describing why not to use the N-word after around 150 staffers — a fraction of the Times’ total staff — complained to the editors.

View source

Related reading: “The Left’s Most Destructive Myths” – Ben Shapiro

View source

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top